Segment
1. Viking WinTech Lowcost2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Viking WinTech vs. Debica Frigo HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Viking winter tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Debica (52%). In this particular case, the Viking WinTech has a better rating of 59% compared to 52% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Viking WinTech was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Debica Frigo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the WinTech and the Frigo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Viking WinTech
| Debica Frigo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Debica Frigo HP2 16.132. Viking WinTech 20.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Viking WinTech Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Viking WinTech Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,0 | 30,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 37,1 | 27,1 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 35,8 | - | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
