Segment
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium2. Michelin Energy Saver + Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs. Michelin Energy Saver +
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Vredestein (34%). But when it comes to comparing Vredestein Sportrac 5 and Michelin Energy Saver +, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Sportrac 5 and the Energy Saver + were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Vredestein Sportrac 5
| Michelin Energy Saver +
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Satisfactory2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Michelin Energy Saver + Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 36,8 | 37 | |||||
| Michelin Energy Saver + | 37,5 | 38,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,0 | 3,2 | 2,0 | ||
| Michelin Energy Saver + Rating: Good | 3,0 | 1,9 | 0,5 | 3,2 | 1,8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,0 | 3,3 | 2,1 | ||
| Michelin Energy Saver + Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 3,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
