Segment
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs. Nokian Line SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Vredestein (34%). But when it comes to comparing Vredestein Sportrac 5 and Nokian Line SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Sportrac 5 and the Line SUV were tested.
| # | Vredestein Sportrac 5
| Nokian Line SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian Line SUV Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 137 | 54 | 47 | 16 | 6 | ||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Recommended | 141 | 61 | 44 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
