Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK520 has a better rating of 72% compared to 71% of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Pro was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Falken Azenis FK520 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2025 225/45 R18 test, where both the Ultrac Pro and the Azenis FK520 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Falken Azenis FK520
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R45 | R17 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended
2. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 279 | 141 | 139 | ||||
Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: - | 230 | 115 | 115 | ||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: - | 219 | 102 | 117 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,4 | |||||
Show test details |