Segment
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama Advan Sport V107 vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
Table of contents:
| # | Yokohama Advan Sport V107
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R24 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The comparison between Yokohama Advan Sport V107 and the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 reveals interesting results.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V107, produced by Yokohama, earned a rating of 42% on our site. This summer tyre was noted for its excellent properties on dry roads, good characteristics on wet surfaces, and rather low fuel consumption. However, it did underperform in some areas, notably aquaplaning and anticipated tread life. It was positioned at 6 out of 18 in the ADAC tests and achieved the 4th place out of 50 in the Autobild tests. Highlighted features of the Yokohama tyre were its dry braking, being one of the best features in the Autobild tests.
On the other hand, the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2, manufactured by Dunlop, secured a higher rating of 72% on our site. This Ultra-High-Performance summer tyre exhibited good grip on both dry and wet surfaces, emerging as the lightest tyre in the ADAC 2020 test and showing noteworthy fuel efficiency. However, it was marked down for an average tread life prediction and increased wear. In the ADAC test, it stood at position 9 out of 18, while it came at the 13th place among 50 tyres tested by Autobild. Notably, it excelled in Cross and Longitudinal Aquaplaning during the Autobild tests.
Overall, the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 outperformed the Yokohama Advan Sport V107, achieving a higher overall rating. Nevertheless, each tyre has its strengths and weaknesses; therefore, the final decision should correlate with the specific driving needs and conditions for each user. Both tyres did not get replaced by newer models, indicating that they are still up-to-date options.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended2. Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Satisfactory2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Rating: Good | 3,2 | 1,9 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Good | 2,9 | 2,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 | 33.8 | 31.8 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 35.2 | 31.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3- | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 | 58.9 | 25.4 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 61.8 | 27 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
