14 shops, 56 847 products

|

Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Advantage were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings.

#	Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 /0%	BFGoodrich Advantage /66%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 59

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 2x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 10.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 25.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 17.5

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 2022

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich Advantage Good

2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient

2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BLUEARTH-GT AE51

65.7%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

61.2%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BLUEARTH-GT AE51

82.4%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BLUEARTH-GT AE51

90%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

79.1%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 ?

2. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
Advantage

68.3%

Yokohama
BLUEARTH-GT AE51

60%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 B

2. BFGoodrich Advantage C

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autozeitung

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	146	134
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient	91	113
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Sufficient	108	108
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	35,7	27,5
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51	37,7	32,2
BFGoodrich Advantage	36,3	31
Show test details