Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 vs. Continental EcoContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Yokohama (57%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the BluEarth RV-02 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 has A wet grip rating, whereas 50% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R13 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | ||
| Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
