Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle2. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 vs. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Esa+Tecar). Generally, Yokohama summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Esa+Tecar (50%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the BluEarth RV-02 and the Spirit Pro were tested.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
| Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro 13.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory2. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | ||
| Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
