Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Upper-middle2. Goodride Solmax 1 Lowcost
Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Goodride Solmax 1
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride). Generally, Yokohama summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Goodride (38%). In this particular case, the Yokohama BluEarth-XT has a better rating of 55% compared to 39% of the Goodride Solmax 1. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R18 test, where both the BluEarth-XT and the Solmax 1 were tested. We also know where BluEarth-XT is made - Japan.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth-XT
| Goodride Solmax 1
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Satisfactory2. Goodride Solmax 1 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Satisfactory2. Goodride Solmax 1 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Yokohama BluEarth-XT Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Goodride Solmax 1 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3- | 3+ | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
